The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
«У него самого прекрасный вкус. Ну и мне кажется, что с моим появлением он стал немного по-другому одеваться», — заявила Навка.
。51吃瓜对此有专业解读
马年新春，中国考古博物馆二层公区“上新了”。新展出的28件陶俑，包含5个类型——驮马、鼓乐骑俑、仪仗骑俑、甲胄骑兵俑、甲骑具装俑，向公众揭开北齐帝陵的神秘面纱。
Run up your bill. Gemini API usage isn't free. Depending on the model and context window, a threat actor maxing out API calls could generate thousands of dollars in charges per day on a single victim account.